A frivolous appeal is one filed without a reasonable legal basis, often used to delay a judgment or pressure the other side into a worse settlement. Texas courts of appeals can penalize the party who filed it, ordering that party to pay damages, court costs, or attorney’s fees. If someone in Dallas is using an appeal to stall a case you already won, Texas law gives you a way to push back.
Delay is often the entire point. A judgment debtor who cannot pay, or does not want to, may file an appeal with no real argument simply to buy time. A business partner on the losing end of a contract dispute may do the same to avoid closing a deal. Texas has a legal process for making the party who filed a frivolous appeal pay for the delay.
Ford + Bergner, LLP has spent 25 years helping Texas clients respond to appeals that have little or no chance of success. We know how frustrating it is to see a hard-won judgment held up by a meritless filing. Fill out an online contact form or call (214) 389-0887 to talk through what is happening in your case.
An appeal is generally considered frivolous when there were no reasonable grounds to believe the judgment would be reversed, or when it was pursued in bad faith rather than on the merits. This standard comes from Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 45, which allows a court of appeals to award damages against a party who files an appeal purely to delay enforcement of a judgment or to harass the other side. Courts look closely at the record to decide whether the appeal had any real chance of success when it was filed.
The standard overlaps with rules that apply earlier in a case. Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Chapter 10 authorizes a trial court to sanction a party for signing a pleading or motion without a basis in fact or law. Courts weigh similar questions on appeal, including whether the argument had real support in the record.
A few signs point toward a frivolous appeal:
If a Texas court of appeals agrees an appeal was frivolous, it can award what the rule calls “just damages” to the party who had to defend against it. Those damages can include attorney’s fees, court costs, and additional amounts meant to compensate for the delay. The court sets the exact figure, and it can be substantial if the appeal held up enforcement of a large judgment.
The party defending against the appeal must raise the issue in their response brief or in a separate motion, showing the court exactly why the appeal fails to meet the standard. A court will not search the record on its own to find grounds for sanctions. That step has to be built into the case from the start.
Our attorneys handle appeals for clients throughout Dallas and the rest of Texas, including appeals heard by the Fifth Court of Appeals in Dallas. This includes cases where the other side is using the appellate process as a delay tactic. We review the trial record, the opposing brief, and the timeline of filings to determine whether an appeal meets the legal standard for frivolousness. From there, we build the argument for damages or a faster ruling.
This can include:
Every appeal raises its own issues, and the strength of a frivolous appeal claim depends heavily on the specific record. That review often starts with the same trial record and opposing brief referenced above. Our attorneys review that record with you before recommending an approach, whether that means a focused response brief or a more direct push for sanctions.
Ford + Bergner, LLP listens first before recommending a strategy, because a case built around one delay tactic can look very different from the next. Our attorneys focus on the strategy that fits your case, whether that means shutting down a delay tactic or building a full record to support a damages claim under Rule 45. Clients come to us after judgments have already been won at trial, and our job is making sure that win holds up.
Yes. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 45 allows the court of appeals to award attorneys’ fees and other costs as part of the damages, though the court decides the exact amount on a case-by-case basis.
There is no fixed timeline. A frivolous appeal claim is usually decided alongside the main appeal, so the ruling accompanies the court’s final opinion rather than being decided on a separate schedule.
No. A request for damages under Rule 45 is raised within the existing appeal, not as a separate lawsuit, so it does not add a new proceeding.
A pattern of repeated filings can strengthen a damages claim, since it becomes harder to argue that there was a good-faith reason to believe the outcome would change each time. Our attorneys can also ask the court to consider the full pattern of filings, not just the most recent appeal, when deciding on damages.
Every month an appeal drags on without merit is another month a judgment sits unenforced. Ford + Bergner, LLP has guided Dallas clients through appeals for years, and our attorneys know how to build the case for damages. Fill out an online contact form or call (214) 389-0887 to get started.
